Electra City Tower
58 Harakevet St.
Tel Aviv
6777016
Zohar Haim Levinger
Zohar is a partner in the firm’s Litigation Department, specializing in class actions and commercial litigation.
Zohar Haim Levinger represents clients in all stages of class actions, including responses to motions to certify, appeals, negotiations, and settlements. She provides representation before the courts and during arbitration and mediation proceedings.
In addition, Zohar represents clients in complex civil and commercial litigation and handles intricate commercial disputes. These include derivative claims, shareholder disputes, capital market and securities disputes, communication and media disputes, real estate disputes, contract breaches, and more.
Zohar represents both Israeli and international clients from various industries, including investment companies, banks, insurance companies, food companies, construction companies, media companies, and more.
Prior to joining Barnea Jaffa Lande, Zohar worked in the litigation department of a leading Israeli law firm.
Education:
Reichman University, LL.B. (with honors), 2013
Admission:
Israel Bar Association, 2014
Insights & News - Zohar Haim Levinger:
When Class Actions Become a Pressure Tool Against Small Businesses
In a new article, Adv. Zohar Haim Levinger, a partner in our Litigation Department, examines the growing use of class actions based on technical violations and the erosion of the requirement for a personal cause of action. The article considers how these proceedings can place disproportionate economic pressure on small businesses and calls for a better balance between consumer protection and preventing misuse of the class action mechanism.
Globes' “Three Cases of the Week”: Motion for Class Certification Against Azorim Dismissed
Representing Bank Hapoalim in Class Action Suit
Adv. Eyal Nachshon, Adv. Zohar Haim Levinger, and Adv. Anna Elenport represented Bank Hapoalim in a class action lawsuit filed by the Association of Representatives of Society and the Environment. The motion for certification claims that the bank charged excessive exchange fees when converting monies in foreign currency. The court rejected the motion out of hand and stated that its submission constitutes bad faith conduct and misuse of a legal process.