© All rights reserved to Barnea Jaffa Lande Law offices

Together is global

Litigation / Administrative Law

Due to the nature of their operations, many business companies are required to undergo a variety of proceedings with administrative bodies, government companies, and public authorities.

Our firm advises companies, NPOs, and individuals on complex issues in diverse fields.

Our team represent a wide range of clients which include some of the leading corporates in Israel.

We represent our clients during proceedings before the various administrative bodies and courts, including the Supreme Court. Adv. Zohar Lande, the head of Barnea’s Litigation Department, also represents clients in official discussions in various Knesset committees.

 

We also regularly advise clients from the public sector, as well as state authorities and public bodies, when administrative petitions are filed against them.

 

Our firm has managed administrative proceedings and diverse and pivotal cases in the fields of infrastructure, communications, planning and building, real estate, education, culture and sport, financial services, permits and licenses, and tenders.

 

Back to Litigation

Insights & News - Litigation / Administrative Law:


July 5, 2023

Barnea: Representing RGE in Hot’s Appeal to the Supreme Court over FREETV

Our firm represented RGE in the appeal the television cable company Hot filed with the Israeli Supreme Court over the Second Authority for Television and Radio’s decision to approve the establishment of FREETV, a joint initiative between RGE and Keshet. In its appeal, Hot claimed approval of the project was invalid because of alleged harm to competition and because of the project’s potential consequences on centralization in the media. The Supreme Court rejected the appeal and ruled it was not within Hot’s authority to determine a legal flaw in the decision-making process or the approval itself. RGE was represented by Zohar Lande, Eran Winner, Ido Vakshi, and Lina Makhuli.

October 14, 2021

Representing ISI in a Petition Against the Israeli Ministry of Health

We represented Israel Scientific Instruments Ltd. (ISI) in a petition filed with the Jerusalem District Court against the Ministry of Health and others, claiming that the tender for the purchase of coronavirus tests managed by the Ministry of Health was conducted unequally while giving an unfair advantage to ISI's competitors.

Eran Winner, Ido Vakshi and Gaya Tsarfati, represented ISI in the petition. They petitioned the court with an order to cancel the tender and publish a new one.

August 25, 2020

TheMarker published this morning an in-depth report on the logistics of purchasing COVID-19 products

The article mentions the Ministry of Finance's decision to exempt from a tender process LR Industries Ltd., an Israeli importer, thus allowing it to supply millions of COVID-19 testing kits to the Ministry of Health, at an estimated value of USD 7.7 million. In response, veteran Israeli company Biological Industries Bet Haemek filed an administrative appeal and a motion for an interim order against the decision. This process was led by Advs. Shai Avnieli and Shay Bello from our firm.

Litigation / Administrative Law

Due to the nature of their operations, many business companies are required to undergo a variety of proceedings with administrative bodies, government companies, and public authorities.

Our firm advises companies, NPOs, and individuals on complex issues in diverse fields.

Our team represent a wide range of clients which include some of the leading corporates in Israel.

We represent our clients during proceedings before the various administrative bodies and courts, including the Supreme Court. Adv. Zohar Lande, the head of Barnea’s Litigation Department, also represents clients in official discussions in various Knesset committees.

 

We also regularly advise clients from the public sector, as well as state authorities and public bodies, when administrative petitions are filed against them.

 

Our firm has managed administrative proceedings and diverse and pivotal cases in the fields of infrastructure, communications, planning and building, real estate, education, culture and sport, financial services, permits and licenses, and tenders.

 

Back to Litigation

Insights & News - Litigation:


July 5, 2023

Barnea: Representing RGE in Hot’s Appeal to the Supreme Court over FREETV

Our firm represented RGE in the appeal the television cable company Hot filed with the Israeli Supreme Court over the Second Authority for Television and Radio’s decision to approve the establishment of FREETV, a joint initiative between RGE and Keshet. In its appeal, Hot claimed approval of the project was invalid because of alleged harm to competition and because of the project’s potential consequences on centralization in the media. The Supreme Court rejected the appeal and ruled it was not within Hot’s authority to determine a legal flaw in the decision-making process or the approval itself. RGE was represented by Zohar Lande, Eran Winner, Ido Vakshi, and Lina Makhuli.

October 14, 2021

Representing ISI in a Petition Against the Israeli Ministry of Health

We represented Israel Scientific Instruments Ltd. (ISI) in a petition filed with the Jerusalem District Court against the Ministry of Health and others, claiming that the tender for the purchase of coronavirus tests managed by the Ministry of Health was conducted unequally while giving an unfair advantage to ISI's competitors.

Eran Winner, Ido Vakshi and Gaya Tsarfati, represented ISI in the petition. They petitioned the court with an order to cancel the tender and publish a new one.

August 25, 2020

TheMarker published this morning an in-depth report on the logistics of purchasing COVID-19 products

The article mentions the Ministry of Finance's decision to exempt from a tender process LR Industries Ltd., an Israeli importer, thus allowing it to supply millions of COVID-19 testing kits to the Ministry of Health, at an estimated value of USD 7.7 million. In response, veteran Israeli company Biological Industries Bet Haemek filed an administrative appeal and a motion for an interim order against the decision. This process was led by Advs. Shai Avnieli and Shay Bello from our firm.

Enter your email for newsletter sign up: